|
|
|
The Society is a member of the Institute of Professional Editors Limited (IPEd) |
Dear Ed archiveAugust 2009Dear EdMy friend Cynthia says that words are actually symbols. Is she lying to me?Loren Dear Loren Your friend Cynthia is not lying to you, or at least not on this occasion. Strangely, I'm up to my eyeballs in symbols this month and it's all because of Jorge Luis Borges, but we might as well blame it on Cynthia. My aim this year is to read my way through all the books I've bought and never read. They were accumulating at such a rate that I was considering giving away all the books I've read and just keeping the books I haven't read because they were taking up more shelf space. Maybe I should discard my unwanted books on benches in the local parks, where they can be picked up and treasured as found objects. Anyhoo, to get to the heart of the matter, I found this quote in a slim tome by Jorge Luis Borges called The Book of Sand, which has been waiting 28 years to be read: 'Words are symbols that assume a shared memory'. I stopped reading at that point, which probably wasn't Borges's intention. But what happens if that assumption is incorrect? What if you and Cynthia don't share the same memory of a very basic word, such as table? So there I was, thinking about words and symbols, when I stumbled over these gems and went sprawling in the grass. Perspective drawings are good for communicating scale, portion and space Cash withdrawl at the counter He attempted to break the drought by firing canons into the air Kung fu and karate are marital arts Tom went home today with the flue 40% off Sumer clothing Many players do not eat adequate quantities of iron containing foods Biomechanical principals are made more relevant and meaningful You're probably wanting to know if it was worth waiting 28 years to read The Book of Sand. Mmm, not really. But it does contain two good strong stories, neither of which features footballers eating Comeng trains, and it is written in (or translated into) such clear simple English that it makes your heart sing. The Book of Sand, now with added symbols, coming soon to a park bench near you. Cheers Ed In response to last month's Dear Ed ...Dear Ed There is no need for Gill Sans to hire a debt-collection agency to get On the Nose to pay up. As long as they still exist, the simplest method is to apply for a hearing at the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Sure, it costs you $33 (or did so when I last used this method), but the moment you send the defaulter a copy of the hearing time and date, as required under the VCAT regulations, they pay up. Mine did, anyway. Kim Lockwood |